Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bernie's avatar

I grew up hearing all about this stuff. So much so that I never read the books -- Trojan Horse in the City of God, Iota Unum, etc. etc. that lined the bookshelves. Indeed it became extremely wearisome in that my parents and their friends had few other topics of conversation.

Still, I never doubted that they were right--the NO, when I first encountered it at 5 years old (we had moved to a new town, where there was no JPII "indult") left me uncertain whether the family had left the Catholic Faith! There was never any doubt in my mind that something very important was lacking, even though the NO priests we knew were reverent and orthodox. And recently I've picked up and started reading those boring old tomes (not so boring after all--and highly relevant to today).

Now that I realize more clearly what they went through, I'm no longer surprised at the intensity of emotion and fixity of resolve of my parents and their friends. Their world was torn apart. And they hadn't been prepared for it by years of cautions and warnings about bishops encouraging heresy and cardinals being light in the brogans. But they weathered the shock. They hung on. They read the books. They warned their kids. We know what we do because they didn't collapse like lawn-chairs.

Now it's our turn.

Expand full comment
Bill Redic's avatar

I've heard it's good, but if I had to educate myself at this point by starting out with Iota Unum, I'd never get anywhere. Let me recommend the author whose writing, I think, is most accessible to regular people like me: Michael Davies.

I was pleased to see that his trilogy is still in print, and not a bad price for three hardbound books:

https://angeluspress.org/products/set-the-davies-liturgical-revolution-series

One last note: I started out with Vol. 2, "Pope John's Council", which is packed with action and kept me interested, so I wasn't even tempted to put it down. They needn't be read in the proper order, in my opinion; in fact I'd recommend 2, then 3, then 1.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts